Are orders that do not follow common market practice considered problematic under market integrity clauses?

Orders that do not align with common market practice are indeed scrutinized under market integrity clauses because such practices can disrupt the orderly functioning of the market. The correct answer reflects the idea that these integrity clauses are designed primarily to address actual trades rather than the orders themselves.

The rationale is rooted in ensuring that all market participants engage fairly, and that trades executed reflect genuine supply and demand conditions. While orders that deviate from common practice may raise questions about intent or behavior, it's the executed trades that directly impact market pricing and liquidity, thus falling under the purview of these market integrity rules more distinctly.

This understanding helps clarify that while unusual orders may signal potential issues, the investigation and regulatory response typically focus on the resulting trades and their implications for market integrity rather than the orders alone.